| Faculty | Percentage of voters | Number of voters / Number of Students | |
| BIU_PRIMARY_ORG | 0 % | 0 / 1 | |
| ADMIN | 0.077102803738318 % | 231 / 2996 | |
| ARTS | 0.13544282605056 % | 809 / 5973 | |
| CLAW | 0.085443037974684 % | 81 / 948 | |
| DCIV | 0.088852988691438 % | 55 / 619 | |
| EDU | 0.044745762711864 % | 66 / 1475 | |
| GENIE | 0.1078814980436 % | 193 / 1789 | |
| MED | 0.071287128712871 % | 108 / 1515 | |
| SCIEN | 0.16469517743403 % | 543 / 3297 | |
| SSALG | 0.013671875 % | 7 / 512 | |
| SSAN | 0.11623831775701 % | 398 / 3424 | |
| SSOC | 0.14155770324048 % | 996 / 7036 |
From a well connected source.
Before anyone panics, you should bring the coma to the right by two. So 0,14 = 14% for instance.
4 comments:
Interesting that science students, often times unrepresented by candidates from their faculty, are the highest-voting group of students.
awesome that social sciences are voting so much! woo! how much? i dunno, i hate social science.
Contrary to popular belief, there are a fair amount of involved students in science. We have ways of getting the word out.
Let's say that everything else is equal (i.e. Science students would be just as politically interested as Arts and Social Sciences), I can think of at least one factor that would give them an higher turnout.
Classroom presentations could be seen as the most efficient communications methods during the campaign (the next best thing to one-to-one conversations, and more time-effective). Consider that due to the number of mandatory classes in Science programs, you can get 3rd year biochem. classes with 400 students at Marion Auditorium. How many 2nd-3rd year Arts/Social Sciences classes are that big?
So since Science has larger classes on average (at least the Bio-something programs, which account for 80% of the population of the faculty), it might give it an edge.
Post a Comment